Make the comparisons readable
The alignment discussion compared factory ranges with track-oriented targets, while trying to preserve everyday use. It asked which changes used a dedicated adjuster and which depended on mounting tolerances.
Units and conditions kept becoming obstacles: degrees versus minutes, values per wheel versus totals across an axle, and measurements with or without added load. The requested table needed to put those comparisons on the same basis.
What was reported on 19 February
The front toe was reduced, the rear toe was reduced and brought closer between the two sides, and rear camber was changed. The intended front camber was harder to achieve: the available adjustment range differed between sides and remained a constraint.
The later discussion considered how to work with that front/rear difference. Possible aftermarket parts were researched, with some rejected on cost. Their installation is not established.
Home alignment
Home alignment is part of this project. The equipment and measurement method still need documenting; the recovered February notes also refer to workshop preparation and alignment-machine readings.
Result and open question
The record supports that adjustments were made. It does not contain a measured before-and-after handling comparison or lap-time improvement. The next useful addition would be the actual setup report and observations from use.